Preclinical study reveals WDR23 prevents bone loss by driving TRAF6 degradation during osteoclastogenesis in mouse models, highlighting a potential therapeutic target for osteoporosis.
Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) is a pivotal adaptor molecule in the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK) and its ligand (RANKL) signaling pathways, which are essential for osteoclastogenesis. In this study, we identified WD40 repeat-containing protein 23 (WDR23), also known as DDB1-CUL4 associated factor 11 (DCAF11), as a novel binding partner of TRAF6. Our findings demonstrate that WDR23/DCAF11 acts as a negative feedback regulator of RANK/RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis by promoting the autophagy-dependent degradation of TRAF6. Notably, RANKL induced the upregulation of WDR23 expression during osteoclastogenesis. WDR23 physically interacted with the TRAF domain of TRAF6 via the WD40 repeat domains 1 and 2 of WDR23, resulting in reduced TRAF6 protein stability by its autophagy-dependent degradation during osteoclastogenesis. By modulating TRAF6 protein levels, WDR23 attenuated RANKL signaling cascades, including nuclear factor-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinases, thereby downregulating the expression of osteoclastogenic markers, such as nuclear factor of activated T-cell c1, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein, V-ATPase subunit d2 and cathepsin K. Conversely, WDR23 knockdown or deficiency enhanced RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis by preventing the autophagy-dependent degradation of TRAF6. WDR23-deficient mice exhibit an osteoporotic bone phenotype characterized by elevated osteoclast formation and reduced bone mass. Collectively, these results establish WDR23 as a key negative feedback regulator of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis via autophagy-mediated TRAF6 degradation and underscore its potential as a therapeutic target for bone disorders associated with aberrant osteoclast formation and function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: