Key result
Acute Pain Teams linked to higher use of patient-controlled analgesia, epidurals, and pain management protocols.
Why the study?
Does the presence of an Acute Pain Team improve organizational and clinical initiatives for postoperative pain management in acute English hospitals?
Cross-Sectional (n=226)
Yes
Does the presence of an Acute Pain Team improve organizational and clinical initiatives for postoperative pain management in acute English hospitals?
The presence of Acute Pain Teams in English hospitals is associated with improved organizational and clinical practices for postoperative pain management.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports APTs for postoperative pain initiatives in English hospitals; observational data leaves open causality and should not yet change practice.
This survey describes the current provision of multidisciplinary Acute Pain Teams (APTs) in acute English hospitals performing adult in-patient surgery (excluding maternity). Associations between the presence of an APT and a number of organizational and clinical initiatives for the management of postoperative pain are also explored. Postal questionnaires were sent to the Clinical Director of Anaesthetics or head of the APT at every acute English hospital providing separate anaesthetic services. After written and telephone reminders, the response rate was 86% (n = 226). Eighty-four per cent (n = 190) of respondents had an APT in their hospital. The presence of an APT was associated (P</=0.05) with higher estimates of patient controlled analgesia and epidural use, regular in-service training for nurses and junior doctors, written guidelines/protocols for management of postoperative pain, routine use of postoperative pain measurement systems and audit/research in relation to postoperative pain issues. Acute Pain Teams, in which nurses play a major role, have a pivotal influence not only in relation to postoperative analgesia but also in wider service development. Since 1995, the number of hospitals offering in-patient surgery that are covered by an APT has risen. However, despite repeated endorsements from professional bodies, some acute hospitals still have no APT and recent evidence indicates that some APTs face financial problems and provide a 'token' service only. Recent policy recommendations may have little impact on the current situation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McDonnell et al. (2003) conducted a cross-sectional in Postoperative pain management (n=226). Presence of an Acute Pain Team (APT) vs. Absence of an APT was evaluated on Organizational and clinical initiatives for postoperative pain management (p=<=0.05). The presence of an Acute Pain Team in English hospitals was associated with higher estimates of patient-controlled analgesia, epidural use, and pain management protocols (P<=0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: