Key result
The Kubios HRV smartphone application demonstrated excellent validity (r = 0.94) and reliability (intra-rater α = 0.868, inter-rater α = 0.890) compared to standard ECG for measuring heart rate variability.
Why the study?
Heart rate variability provides a non-invasive assessment of cardiac autonomic control, and the study aimed to establish the reliability and validity of the Kubios HRV smartphone application.
Does the Kubios HRV smartphone application provide valid and reliable measurements of heart rate variability compared to a 12-lead ECG in healthy office workers?
Cross-Sectional (n=50)
No
Does the Kubios HRV smartphone application provide valid and reliable measurements of heart rate variability compared to a 12-lead ECG in healthy office workers?
The Kubios HRV smartphone application with a Polar H10 chest strap provides a valid and reliable alternative to 12-lead ECG for short-term heart rate variability measurement in resting conditions.
Introduction: Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis has given a non-invasive way for assessing cardiac autonomic control. Reduced HRV is an independent indicator of poor prognosis in both heart disease patients and the general population. Aim/Objective: To establish reliability and validity for Kubios HRV smart phone application. Materials and methods: Fifty (n =50) office workers volunteered for the study, with 10 females and 40 males ranging in age from 30 to 50 years (Mean age =38.4±5.6). To evaluate Intra and Inter-rater reliability and validity the of HRV parameter, R-R intervals comparing simultaneous recording from ECG and Kubios HRV app, at different three times (day1,day2 &day3) one day apart and by two different trained examiners in the same participants. Each participants rested in supine for 10 minutes prior to the assessment and was instructed to remain relaxed, breathe properly, and refrain from talking and sleeping during the measurement. The RR intervals (R-R) were recorded during a 5 min period in supine position using ECG and polar H10 monitor with Kubios HRV smartphone application. Results: Kubios HRV smart phone application shows excellent reliability, Intra-rater (α =0.868) and Inter-rater (α =0.890) and Validity (r = 0.94) with R-R intervals calculated from ECG. Conclusion: The Kubios HRV smart phone application provides an accurate and reliable alternative to the ECG for acquiring inter-beat interval time series data. The Kubios HRV app gives an R-R interval that can be used for short term HRV analysis in office workers from steady resting conditions, supporting the selection of this approach of evaluation in research and clinical practise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gabani et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy office workers (n=50). Kubios HRV smart phone application with Polar H10 monitor vs. 12-lead ECG was evaluated on Validity of R-R intervals (correlation coefficient) (r = 0.94). The Kubios HRV smartphone application demonstrated excellent validity (r = 0.94) and reliability (intra-rater α = 0.868, inter-rater α = 0.890) compared to standard ECG for measuring heart rate variability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: