Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Formaldehyde, when applied with acid catalysis, is the most effective cellulose cross linker available in that it produces the most crushproofing on a weight basis. However, formalization is accompanied by high strength loss in cotton. It has been postulated that the unfavorable crease recovery-strength relationship with formaldehyde is a function of the shortness of the acetal cross-link. It has also been postulated, naively, that longer cross-links could be derived from long chain dialdehydes, the crease recovery-strength relationship improving with increasing chain length. Work with the dialdehydes glyoxal (C 2 ). glutaraldehyde (C 5 ). and α-hydroxy adipaldehyde (C 6 ) yielded crease recovery-strength relationships similar, if not identical. to formaldehyde. This tinding is consistent with the known chemistry of the formalde hyde-cellulose reaction in that the acetal linkage controls the length of the cross-link.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hurwitz et al. (1958) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: