Key result
Acute coronary intervention in haemodynamically unstable patients with perioperative myocardial infarction was not associated with improved short-term survival (p=0.53).
Why the study?
Do acute coronary interventions improve short-term survival in patients with perioperative myocardial infarction following noncardiac surgery?
Systematic Review (n=89)
Do acute coronary interventions improve short-term survival in patients with perioperative myocardial infarction following noncardiac surgery?
There is a severe lack of high-quality evidence for the management of perioperative myocardial infarction, with existing case reports showing no clear short-term survival benefit from acute coronary interventions in hemodynamically unstable patients.
Acute coronary intervention should not yet change practice in unstable perioperative MI; leaves open the need for prospective randomized trials.
Background: Perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) is a common complication following noncardiac surgery, with a 30-day mortality of 10–20%. Effective therapeutic interventions are of public health importance.Method: This is a systematic review, aimed to determine the evidence for therapies following PMI.Results: A PubMed Central search up to May 2011 identified 20 case series and reports (89 patients). We extracted data on the type and timing of treatment and short-term mortality. Short-term mortality differed significantly between haemodynamically stable and unstable patients (0% and 32.2% respectively, p-value = 0.015). Significantly more haemodynamically unstable patients received acute coronary interventions (75.8% vs. 23.1%, p-value = 0.0006). Acute coronary intervention in haemodynamically unstable patients was not associated with improved short-term survival (p-value = 0.53). The high proportion of symptomatic and haemodynamically unstable patients suggests publication bias (χ2 = 16.29, p-value = 0 < 0001 and χ2 = 154.41, p-value < 0.0001, respectively).Conclusion: This systematic review highlights the paucity of evidence for PMI management, and the need for future prospective trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryan et al. (2012) conducted a systematic review in Perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) following noncardiac surgery (n=89). Acute coronary interventions vs. No acute coronary intervention was evaluated on Short-term survival (p=0.53). Acute coronary intervention in haemodynamically unstable patients with perioperative myocardial infarction was not associated with improved short-term survival (p=0.53).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: