Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Emotion regulation is relevant to psychological adjustment among university students, particularly in contexts characterized by academic pressure and increasing demands for autonomy. This cross-sectional study examined associations between cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, depression, anxiety, stress, and life satisfaction in 106 undergraduate students enrolled in a Social Education degree at a public university in Andalusia, Spain. Participants completed the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the Satisfaction With Life Scale, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21. Internal consistency was high across the six study dimensions (Cronbach's α =.846–.921; McDonald's ω =.848–.921). Life satisfaction was negatively correlated with depression, anxiety, and stress, and the three distress dimensions were positively interrelated. In gender-adjusted hierarchical regressions, emotion-regulation scores explained additional variance in anxiety and stress, but not in depression or life satisfaction. Several associations were opposite to the directions commonly reported in the literature: cognitive reappraisal was positively associated with anxiety, whereas expressive suppression was negatively associated with anxiety and stress. The item-level structural model produced mixed fit evidence: RMSEA, CFI, and TLI/NNFI were favorable, but SRMR, GFI, AGFI, NFI, and RFI indicated important limitations. Because indirect effects were not estimated and the data were cross-sectional, the model does not demonstrate mediation or causal pathways. The findings should therefore be regarded as sample-specific associations requiring replication and a complete scoring audit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Augusto-Landa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: