OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers real-time glucose data that may improve dysglycemia detection in critically ill patients; however, evidence supporting its clinical effectiveness in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether a nurse-driven hybrid continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) plus point-of-care (POC) validation protocol improves glycemic outcomes compared with standard POC monitoring alone among medical ICU patients receiving continuous intravenous (IV) insulin. METHODS: In this single-center prospective intervention cohort study, 100 MICU patients receiving continuous IV insulin were monitored using a hybrid CGM+POC protocol and compared with 100 matched historical controls. The primary outcome was % time in glucose range (70-180 mg/dL) during continuous IV insulin therapy, calculated using POC values (at least every 4 hours) for between-group comparisons. Secondary outcomes included % time in additional glucose ranges, hyperglycemia (>250 and >400 mg/dL), and hypoglycemia (<70 and <54 mg/dL). RESULTS: Compared with controls, CGM-managed patients achieved an increased time in range (76%±18 vs 64%±21; p<0.001) with persistent improvement after adjusting for confounders and marked reductions in severe hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL: 6%±11 vs 17%±18; >300 mg/dL: 2.7±0.6% vs 11.3±1.4%; p<0.001 for both). Hypoglycemic events were infrequent and similar between groups. A total of 3,590 temporally matched CGM-POC pairs were available for analysis. CONCLUSION: In this prospective MICU cohort, real-time hybrid CGM use improved glycemic control and reduced severe hyperglycemia without increasing hypoglycemia, supporting further evaluation of structured CGM integration in critical care practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faulds et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: