TiO 2 ‐WO 3 photocatalysts were prepared in a vacuum evaporator by impregnation of TiO 2 with WO 2 dissolved in an H 2 O 2 solution (30%) and followed by calcination at 400 and 600 ∘ C. XRD analyses showed that at 400 ∘ C monoclinic phase of WO 3 was dominated whereas at 600 ∘ C both monoclinic and regular phases of WO 3 were present. Modification of TiO 2 by WO 3 caused increasing in the absorption of light to the visible range. TiO 2 and photocatalysts modified with low amount of WO 3 (1–5 wt.%) showed high adsorption of Acid Red (AR) on their surface and enhanced photocatalytic activity under UV irradiation. Under visible light irradiation, TiO 2 ‐WO 3 photocatalysts prepared at 400 ∘ C were more active for AR decomposition than those prepared at 600 ∘ C suggesting that monoclinic phase of WO 3 is more active under visible light than regular WO 3 . Although TiO 2 ‐WO 3 photocatalysts appeared to be active under visible light for decomposition of AR, the UV irradiation was more efficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tryba et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: