This paper concerns the brief history of the Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) concept. It shows that the success of the concept in academic and policy circles is because, unlike most regional economic policy instruments, it is flexible and eschews ‘one-size-fits-all’ type thinking by analysing and advocating different instruments according to the characteristics of the region. There are three sources of influence upon the concept. The first one is general systems theory, especially as it evolved in the late 1960s as the systems planning perspective. Second the innovation systems approach was influenced by an emergent regional innovation policy and practice literature in the 1980s. Finally, it drew on ideas of ‘network regions’ which themselves have origins in industrial district theory, milieu research and innovation systems studies. Most recently the use of ‘related variety’ analysis, particularly applied regarding ‘green innovation’ has yielded an exciting explanation of regional growth by (Jacobian) cluster mutation. At the policy level, RIS strategies have in recent years been adopted by multilateral agencies and many countries and regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philip Cooke (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: