PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2026Journal of Digital Imaging0 citations

A Multitask Deep Learning Pipeline for Classifying Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Hypertensive Heart Disease Based on Native T1 Mapping

View Full Paper
HZHonglin ZhuYQYufan QianXYXuan Yang

Key Result

A multitask deep learning pipeline accurately classified hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease from native T1 maps, achieving an AUC of 0.941 (95% CI 0.903-0.979).

Key Points

  • To develop and evaluate a multitask deep learning pipeline utilizing native T1 mapping to accurately distinguish hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from hypertensive heart disease.
  • Analyzed 3.0-T MOLLI native T1 maps from 174 patients (121 HCM, 53 HHD) using a two-stage protocol with patient-level stratified fivefold cross-validation and an independent external test set (N=20).
  • Constructed a multitask architecture with an ImageNet-pretrained ConvNeXt-base encoder, a lightweight feature pyramid segmentation head, and myocardium probability-weighted attention pooling.
  • Compared performance against single-task models, state space (Mamba) architectures, and a multivariable clinical logistic regression baseline.
  • The multitask model achieved an AUC of 0.941 (95% CI 0.903–0.979), significantly outperforming the multivariable clinical baseline (AUC 0.757, p < 0.0001) and exceeding the best single-task model (AUC 0.902, ΔAUC +0.039, bootstrap CI +0.007 to +0.074).
  • The segmentation branch obtained a Dice coefficient of 0.823, while alternative Mamba architectures showed markedly inferior discrimination (AUC 0.633–0.719).
  • On the independent external test set of 20 patients, the pipeline sustained an AUC of 0.885 with 0.917 sensitivity and 0.625 specificity.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=174)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does a multitask deep learning pipeline improve the classification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease based on native T1 mapping compared to clinical and single-task baselines?

P
Population
174 patients (121 HCM, 53 HHD) with 3.0-T MOLLI native T1 maps analyzed retrospectively, plus an independent external test set of 20 patients.
E
Exposure
Multitask deep learning pipeline (shared ImageNet-pretrained ConvNeXt-base encoder, lightweight feature pyramid segmentation head, myocardium probability-weighted attention pooling) for analyzing native T1 maps.
C
Comparator
Single-task models, multivariable clinical logistic regression baseline, and state space (Mamba) architectures.
O
Outcome
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for classifying HCM versus HHD.surrogate

A multitask deep learning pipeline using native T1 mapping provides highly accurate differentiation between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease, outperforming standard clinical models.

Main Result

Effect estimate: AUC 0.941 (95% CI 0.903-0.979)

p-value: p=<0.0001

Limitations

  • Larger multicenter validation is required
  • larger multicenter validation is required

Abstract

Differentiating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) from hypertensive heart disease (HHD) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) native T1 mapping is clinically important, yet the two conditions overlap morphologically and global T1 values provide only moderate discrimination. We developed and rigorously evaluated a multitask deep learning pipeline for HCM/HHD classification. In this retrospective single-center study, 174 patients (121 HCM, 53 HHD) with 3.0-T modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) native T1 maps were analyzed under a two-stage protocol that strictly separated model selection from patient-level stratified fivefold cross-validation. The multitask model, comprising a shared ImageNet-pretrained ConvNeXt-base encoder, a lightweight feature pyramid segmentation head, and myocardium probability-weighted attention pooling, was compared with single-task models, a multivariable clinical logistic regression baseline, and state space (Mamba) architectures. The final model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.941 (95% confidence interval CI 0.903-0.979), numerically higher than the best single-task model (0.902, ΔAUC + 0.039, bootstrap CI + 0.007 to + 0.074) and the clinical baseline (0.757, p < 0.0001), with consistent gains across four cross-validation seeds (mean 0.929). Its segmentation branch reached a Dice coefficient of 0.823, and all Mamba baselines were inferior (AUC 0.633-0.719). On an independent external test set of 20 patients, the model achieved AUC 0.885 (sensitivity 0.917, specificity 0.625). A multitask deep learning pipeline with segmentation-derived spatial regularization provides accurate HCM/HHD classification from native T1 maps, exceeding single-task and clinical baselines; larger multicenter validation is required.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease (n=174). Multitask deep learning pipeline vs. Single-task models and clinical logistic regression baseline was evaluated on HCM/HHD classification (Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) (AUC 0.941, 95% CI 0.903-0.979, p=<0.0001). A multitask deep learning pipeline accurately classified hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease from native T1 maps, achieving an AUC of 0.941 (95% CI 0.903-0.979).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa2b17958559d80afc76203https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-026-02248-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Progression of Hypertensive Heart Disease2011 · 858 citations
  2. 2Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for discrimination of hypertensive heart disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy2014 · 655 citations
  4. 4Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy2017 · 1,404 citations
  5. 52014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy2014 · 4,365 citations