A multitask deep learning pipeline accurately classified hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease from native T1 maps, achieving an AUC of 0.941 (95% CI 0.903-0.979).
Observational (n=174)
No
Does a multitask deep learning pipeline improve the classification of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease based on native T1 mapping compared to clinical and single-task baselines?
A multitask deep learning pipeline using native T1 mapping provides highly accurate differentiation between hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease, outperforming standard clinical models.
Effect estimate: AUC 0.941 (95% CI 0.903-0.979)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Differentiating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) from hypertensive heart disease (HHD) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) native T1 mapping is clinically important, yet the two conditions overlap morphologically and global T1 values provide only moderate discrimination. We developed and rigorously evaluated a multitask deep learning pipeline for HCM/HHD classification. In this retrospective single-center study, 174 patients (121 HCM, 53 HHD) with 3.0-T modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) native T1 maps were analyzed under a two-stage protocol that strictly separated model selection from patient-level stratified fivefold cross-validation. The multitask model, comprising a shared ImageNet-pretrained ConvNeXt-base encoder, a lightweight feature pyramid segmentation head, and myocardium probability-weighted attention pooling, was compared with single-task models, a multivariable clinical logistic regression baseline, and state space (Mamba) architectures. The final model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.941 (95% confidence interval CI 0.903-0.979), numerically higher than the best single-task model (0.902, ΔAUC + 0.039, bootstrap CI + 0.007 to + 0.074) and the clinical baseline (0.757, p < 0.0001), with consistent gains across four cross-validation seeds (mean 0.929). Its segmentation branch reached a Dice coefficient of 0.823, and all Mamba baselines were inferior (AUC 0.633-0.719). On an independent external test set of 20 patients, the model achieved AUC 0.885 (sensitivity 0.917, specificity 0.625). A multitask deep learning pipeline with segmentation-derived spatial regularization provides accurate HCM/HHD classification from native T1 maps, exceeding single-task and clinical baselines; larger multicenter validation is required.
Zhu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease (n=174). Multitask deep learning pipeline vs. Single-task models and clinical logistic regression baseline was evaluated on HCM/HHD classification (Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) (AUC 0.941, 95% CI 0.903-0.979, p=<0.0001). A multitask deep learning pipeline accurately classified hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease from native T1 maps, achieving an AUC of 0.941 (95% CI 0.903-0.979).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: