INTRODUCTION: Hemolysis is considered a class effect and a rare adverse event that can occur following therapy with human normal immunoglobulin for intravenous administration [i.e., intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)]. Anti-A/B isoagglutinins (also referred to as isohemagglutinins) originating from donor plasma are present in polyvalent immunoglobulin G (IgG) products and are considered a probable risk factor for hemolysis. We hypothesized that, by excluding plasma from donors with high isoagglutinin titers, the final IVIG product would have a meaningful reduction in anti-A/B isoagglutinin titers. METHODS: A method for screening donor plasma for anti-A isoagglutinins using an automated indirect agglutination test (IAT) was developed. A cut-off for donor plasma exclusion was defined. Industry-scale donor plasma pools and final IVIG product were prepared according to the manufacturing process of Privigen(®) (CSL Behring, Berne, Switzerland; human 10% liquid IVIG). Anti-A/B isoagglutinin content in pooled plasma and final IVIG product was measured by IAT, direct agglutination test, and a flow cytometry-based assay [fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) anti-A]. RESULTS: Screening of plasma from 705 donors identified 48 (6.8%) donors with high anti-A isoagglutinin titers in plasma (IAT agglutination score ≥2+ in a 1:200 pre-dilution). Exclusion of plasma from these donors resulted in a one-titer-step reduction of anti-A isoagglutinin in pooled plasma, confirmed by a twofold anti-A isoagglutinin concentration reduction measured by FACS anti-A (1,352 vs. 2,467 µg/g IgG). When the same screening and exclusion were applied to industrial-scale plasma pools (resulting in the exclusion of plasma from 5% of donors), anti-A isoagglutinins were reduced by one titer step in the final IVIG product. Anti-B isoagglutinins were also reduced by one titer step, as many donors with high anti-A isoagglutinins also have high anti-B. CONCLUSION: Reduction of anti-A/B isoagglutinin titers in IVIG products on an industrial scale is feasible through implementation of anti-A donor screening, which may reduce the risk of hemolysis following IVIG therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siani et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: