Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The photosynthetic prokaryote Prochlorococcus appears to have a high capacity to modify its physiological and optical properties in response to changes in available irradiance.In order to study the time scale of variations in light absorption induced by photoacclimation, 2 strains (MED, clone CCMP 1378, and SARG, unialgal strain) were grown in batch cultures at high (56 7 pm01 quanta m-* S-') or low (8.4 1.1rnol quanta m-' S-') irradiance.Then the temporal changes over 3 to 4 d in spectral absorption coefficients, pigment composition, cell number density and size distribution were followed for cultures transferred from high to low irradiance, and vice versa.Both strains experienced sign~ficant changes in their divinyl-chlorophyll a-specific absorption coefficients (a') in response to the transfers.For the MED strain, photoacclimation appeared to be achieved within about 40 h (covering 2 cell generations) for the low to high irradiance transfer, while 3 to 4 d (correspondmg to l doubling of the population) were necessary for the high to low irradiance transfer For the SARG strain transferred from h ~g h to low irradiance, in spite of a rapid change in absorption during the first 25 h (i.e.within the same cell generation), full photoacclimation was not achieved after 3 d.The efficiency factors for absorption, Qa(h), and the a'(h) coefficients, were reconstructed from theory at the different photoacclimation stages from the cell characteristics, i.e. intracellular concentrations of the various pigments and cell size distribution.This permitted the determination of the parameters which are mainly responsible for the observed changes.The Q&) values (and therefore the package effect) are enhanced at low irradiance by 2 effects resulting from photoacclimation: the increase of the intracellular concentration of divinylchlorophyll a, and (for the SARG straln only) the increase of the intracellular concentration of chlorophyll b.In addition, thegresence of zeaxanthin, in stable amounts within the cells whatever the irradlance, enhances the Q,$) values for all light conditions, and thus 'moderates' its variations with irradiance.Contrary to what is commonly admitted because of its tiny size, the absorption efficiency of Proch1orococcus (per pigment unit) is not always maximal, but can be reduced by 20 to 25 % at low irrad i a n c e ~, such as those prevailing in the lower part of the euphotlc zone.This reduction directly affects the amount of absorbed energy usable for photosynthesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bricaud et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: