In vitro comparative study reveals superior internal fit in internal hex connections and zirconia abutments, indicating material and geometry significantly influence implant stability.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the internal fit of hybrid and internal hex connections using different materials. Materials&Methods: Forty abutments were divided into 2 groups according to connection type. Each group was subdivided into 4 subgroups according to material (Zr, Ti, Co-Cr and soft-milled Co-Cr-Mo). Internal fit was measured using replica technique. Results: All the samples had clinically acceptable gap values ≤150 µm where internal hex connection had narrower gap than conical connection. Zirconia was the material with lowest gap values, followed by titanium and soft-milled Co-Cr-Mo. Co-Cr had the largest gap distance. Conclusions: 1: Internal hex connection has better internal fit than hybrid connection with more consistent results among different materials. 2: Zirconia showed the best overall internal adaptation with consistent performance among the two connections used. 3: Low marginal gap distance of CAD/CAM conical abutments may not necessarily indicate proper seating of the abutments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elbanna et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: