PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2004European Heart Journal250 citationsOpen Access

Risk of decompression illness among 230 divers in relation to the presence and size of patent foramen ovale

View Full Paper
STS Torti

Key Result

The presence of a patent foramen ovale in scuba divers was associated with a significantly higher risk of experiencing ≥1 major decompression illness events compared to those without (29% vs 6%, P=0.016).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=230)

Structured PICO

Does the presence and size of a patent foramen ovale increase the risk of decompression illness in scuba divers?

P
Population
230 scuba divers with ≥200 dives and strict adherence to decompression tables, assessed for the presence of a patent foramen ovale and history of decompression illness.
E
Exposure
Presence and size (graded 0-3) of patent foramen ovale (PFO) detected by contrast trans-oesophageal echocardiography (TEE).
C
Comparator
Absence of patent foramen ovale (PFO).
O
Outcome
Incidence of major decompression illness (DCI) events.hard clinical

The presence and increasing size of a patent foramen ovale in scuba divers is associated with a significantly higher risk of major decompression illness, although the absolute risk remains low.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 5

Absolute Event Rate: 29% vs 6%

p-value: p=0.016

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of developing decompression illness (DCI) in divers with a patent foramen ovale (PFO) has not been directly determined so far; neither has it been assessed in relation to the PFO's size. METHODS: In 230 scuba divers (age 39+/-8 years), contrast trans-oesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed for the detection and size grading (0-3) of PFO. Prior to TEE, the study individuals answered a detailed questionnaire about their health status and about their diving habits and accidents. For inclusion into the study, > or =200 dives and strict adherence to decompression tables were required. RESULTS: Sixty-three divers (27%) had a PFO. Overall, the absolute risk of suffering a DCI event was 2.5 per 10(4) dives. There were 18 divers (29%) with, and 10 divers (6%) without, PFO who had experienced > or =1 major DCI events P=0.016. In the group with PFO, the incidence per 10(4) dives of a major DCI, a DCI lasting longer than 24 h and of being treated in a decompression chamber amounted to 5.1 (median 0, interquartile range IQR 0-10.0), 1.9 (median 0, IQR 0-4.0) and 3.6 (median 0, IQR 0-9.8), respectively and was 4.8-12.9-fold higher than in the group without PFO (P<0.001). The risk of suffering a major DCI, of a DCI lasting longer than 24 h and of being treated by recompression increased with rising PFO size. CONCLUSION: The presence of a PFO is related to a low absolute risk of suffering five major DCI events per 10(4) dives, the odds of which is five times as high as in divers without PFO. The risk of suffering a major DCI parallels PFO size.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

S Torti (2004) conducted an observational in Decompression illness (n=230). Patent foramen ovale (PFO) vs. No PFO was evaluated on ≥1 major decompression illness (DCI) events (OR 5, p=0.016). The presence of a patent foramen ovale in scuba divers was associated with a significantly higher risk of experiencing ≥1 major decompression illness events compared to those without (29% vs 6%, P=0.016).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa2c9e08adb575768fdd2dahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehj.2004.04.028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper