Key result
The estimated direct maternal mortality rate after elective caesarean section was 0.148 per 1000, which is 8.7 times greater than the rate of 0.017 per 1000 for vaginal delivery.
Why the study?
Does the rate of caesarean section affect maternal mortality?
Does the rate of caesarean section affect maternal mortality?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The editorial discusses the controversy over optimal caesarean section rates and its potential impact on maternal mortality.
EDITOR, - The controversy over the optimal rate of caesarean section continues1,2 in the absence of clear evidence on the relative benefit of higher or lower rates. There is a large literature on the variation in rates, but this is mostly concerned with its determinants3,4 rather than the more fundamental question: what difference does it make? Craig R Leitch and James J Walker state a commonly held view - that the focus of study should be the reasons or indications for caesarean section.2 Yet, as they also state on the basis of their unit's experience over 30 years, a large difference in caesarean section rates (7% rising to 17%, judging from their figure) is compatible with the absence of change in the most common indications, failure to progress and fetal distress. Both these indications are continuous variables, so it is …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Joffe (1994) conducted a letter in Pregnancy (n=2,360,309). Elective caesarean section vs. Vaginal delivery was evaluated on Direct maternal death rate per 1000 deliveries (RR 8.7). The estimated direct maternal mortality rate after elective caesarean section was 0.148 per 1000, which is 8.7 times greater than the rate of 0.017 per 1000 for vaginal delivery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: