Male genital self-mutilation is uncommon, with repeat mutilation even more rare. Our case is unique in that a urological complication of the first mutilating act (meatal stenosis) helped to precipitate the second incident. This case underscores the need not only for immediate urological and psychiatric care at the time of initial mutilation but also for close, combined followup care as well. In the majority of cases, when properly monitored, the men do not repeat the mutilating act.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Walter et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: