Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Microscopic holographic PIV performed in an optically index-matched facility resolves the three-dimensional flow in the inner part of a turbulent channel flow over a rough wall at Reynolds number Reτ = 3520 . The roughness consists of uniformly distributed pyramids with normalized height of kₛ⁺ = 1. 5k⁺ = 97 . Distributions of mean flow and Reynolds stresses agree with two-dimensional PIV data except very close to the wall ( < 0. 7k ) owing to the higher resolution of holography. Instantaneous realizations reveal that the roughness sublayer is flooded by low-lying spanwise and groove-parallel vortical structures, as well as quasi-streamwise vortices, some quite powerful, that rise at sharp angles. Conditional sampling and linear stochastic estimation (LSE) reveal that the prevalent flow phenomenon in the roughness sublayer consists of interacting U-shaped vortices, conjectured in Hong et al. (J. Fluid Mech., 2012, doi:10.1017/jfm.2012.403 ). Their low-lying base with primarily spanwise vorticity is located above the pyramid ridgeline, and their inclined quasi-streamwise legs extend between ridgelines. These structures form as spanwise vorticity rolls up in a low-speed region above the pyramid’s forward face, and is stretched axially by the higher-speed flow between ridgelines. Ejection induced by interactions among legs of vortices generated by neighbouring pyramids appears to be the mechanism that lifts the quasi-streamwise vortex legs and aligns them preferentially at angles of 54 63 to the streamwise direction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talapatra et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: