Key result
Left atrial volume index demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with an AUC of 0.949, significantly superior to NT-proBNP (AUC 0.760).
Why the study?
To assess the value of left atrium volume index (LAVI) for diagnosing HFpEF based on the invasive determination of LVEDP.
Does left atrial volume index (LAVI) accurately diagnose HFpEF in patients with dyspnea and LVEF ≥50%?
Observational (n=710)
Single-blind
No
Does left atrial volume index (LAVI) accurately diagnose HFpEF in patients with dyspnea and LVEF ≥50%?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.949% vs 0.76%
p-value: p=<0.0001
LAVI measured by echocardiography is positively correlated with invasive LVEDP and offers high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing HFpEF in patients with dyspnea.
LAVI may aid noninvasive HFpEF diagnosis over NT-proBNP; leaves open prospective validation against invasive hemodynamics.
Objective To assess the value of left atrium volume index(LAVI)for diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) based on the invasive determination of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP).Methods A total of 710 cases of patients with dyspnea (LVEF≥50%) were enrolled in this retrospective study. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was measured through selective coronary angiography. According to the value of LVEDP, cases were divided into the HFpEF group ( LVEDP≥15mmHg) and the control group (LVEDP<15mmHg). LAVI was calculated based on cardiac compartment diameter, as measured by echocardiography, and body surface area (BSA). Differences of LAVI between the HFpEF group and the control group, and between subgroups in the HFpEF group were analyzed.Results The difference in LAVI between the control group and the HFpEF group was statistically significant (41.35±2.28vs.46.78±2.63ml/m2, p=0.008). LVEDP was positively correlated with LAVI (Pearson: r=0.787, P<0.001). When LAVI took the best cutoff value of 43.7 mm/m2, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis of HFpEF were 92.0% and 88.9%. When the boundary value of LAVI was from 41.7 to 45.7 mm/m2, the sensitivity of the diagnosis of ejection fraction retention heart failure was from 97.4% to 64.4% and the specificity was from 51.2.0% to 92.2%.Conclusion In patients with dyspnea after exclusion of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), LAVI is positively correlated with LVEDP. LAVI can be used to diagnose HFpEF when HFrEF is excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pang et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=710). Left atrial volume index (LAVI) vs. NT-proBNP was evaluated on Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for diagnosing HFpEF (95% CI 0.930-0.967, p=<0.0001). Left atrial volume index demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with an AUC of 0.949, significantly superior to NT-proBNP (AUC 0.760).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: