Background The success of root canal therapy is highly dependent on achieving a well-sealed canal system to prevent apical microleakage and reinfection. The apical seal is primarily influenced by the sealing properties of the root canal sealer and the compatibility of the gutta-percha cones used for obturation. Objective To evaluate the apical sealing ability of BioRoot RCS with various hydrophilic-coated gutta-percha cones using spectrophotometric analysis and to assess the obturation material–sealer–dentin interface using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Materials and methods Ninety-six extracted human premolars were randomly divided into four groups ( n = 24) based on the type of gutta-percha cone. Twelve samples per group were subjected to dye extraction with 1% methylene blue, and leakage was measured using a spectrophotometer. The remaining samples were evaluated under a stereomicroscope and SEM to qualitatively assess the sealer–dentin interface. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test ( α = 0.05). Results The BioRoot RCS/bioceramic-coated gutta-percha group exhibited the lowest mean dye absorbance (0.0013 ± 0.0005), whereas the BioRoot RCS/gutta-percha group showed the highest (0.0057 ± 0.0010). SEM analysis demonstrated the smallest mean interfacial gap in the BioRoot RCS/bioceramic-coated gutta-percha group (2.76 ± 0.15 µm) and the largest in the BioRoot RCS/gutta-percha group (5.43 ± 0.16 µm). The differences among the groups were statistically significant ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Bioceramic-coated gutta-percha with BioRoot RCS provided superior sealing ability, confirmed by both spectrophotometric and SEM evaluations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manjunath et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: