Key result
Dual-surgeon approach linked to reduced blood loss, surgical times, and complications in complex spine surgery.
Why the study?
Does a two attending surgeon approach reduce complications and surgical times in patients undergoing complex spine deformity surgery?
Does a two attending surgeon approach reduce complications and surgical times in patients undergoing complex spine deformity surgery?
A dual-surgeon approach in complex spine surgery may improve patient safety and cost-effectiveness by reducing surgical time, blood loss, and complications.
May support dual-surgeon use in complex spine surgery; leaves open prospective confirmation before practice change.
There is an increased trend in complex spine deformity cases toward a two attending surgeon approach, but the practice has not become widely accepted by payers. Multiple studies have shown that spine surgery complications increase with the duration of case, estimated blood loss, and use of transfusions, as well as in certain high-risk populations or those requiring three-column osteotomies. Dual-surgeon cases have been shown to decrease estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, surgical times, and therefore complication rates. Although this practice comes at an uncertain price to medical training and short-term costs, the patient's quality of care should be prioritized by institutions and payers to include dual-surgeon coverage for these high-risk cases. Because we enter an era where the value of spine care and demonstrating cost-effectiveness is essential, dual surgeon attending approaches can enhance these tenets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bauer et al. (2018) conducted a review in Complex spine deformity. Two attending surgeon approach was evaluated. A dual-surgeon approach for complex spine surgery decreases estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, surgical times, and complication rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: