The effect of a dispersion of particles on high-temperature creep has been examined by comparing the creep and recovery properties of Nimonic 80A with those of a single-phase nickel–20% chromium alloy at 750° C. Over most of the creep curve, the strain at any instant can be described accurately as ɛ = ɛ0 + ɛ T (l − e−mt) + έ s t, where ɛ0 is the instantaneous strain on loading, ɛ t the total transient strain, έ s the steady-creep rate, and m a constant relating to the rate of exhaustion of transient creep. Measurements of the rate of recovery during transient and steady-state creep suggest that this equation applies when the creep rate is proportional to the rate of recovery. Deviations from this equation occur during the initial 10–15% of the transient stage, and are attributable to a rapid increase in the coefficient of work-hardening. Although the activation energy for creep and the stress-dependence of the creep rate of the Nimonic alloy are higher than the values obtained for the single-phase alloy, it is suggested that the mechanism of creep is essentially the same in both materials. The creep-resistance of Nimonic 80A is then primarily a result of retardation of recovery by the dispersion of Ni3 (Al,Ti) particles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sidey et al. (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: