Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 26, 2023TrialsOpen Access

A randomised controlled trial in preterm infants comparing prophylactic with selective “less invasive surfactant administration” (pro.LISA)

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

WGWolfgang GöpelUniversity Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinTRTanja K. RauschUniversity Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinBMBarbara MitschdörferBundesverband Flachglas

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Göpel et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa2e0b38adb575768fdd49ahttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07603-7
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Multi‐centre randomised trial of invasive and less invasive surfactant delivery methods showed similar spirometry results at 5–9 years of age2022 · 12 citations
  2. 2Prophylactic versus selective use of surfactant in preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants2012 · 654 citations
  3. 3Assessment of motor ability of 4- and 5-year-old children1997 · 39 citations
  4. 4Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations2012 · 6,046 citations
  5. 5Effect of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy vs Sham Treatment on Death or Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome2021 · 178 citations