Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine the surgical outcome of penetrating duodenal injuries focusing on duodenal leakage. METHODS: A retrospective chart review with a descriptive-analytical design analysed medical records of 36 patients meeting inclusion criteria from a 966-patient database with penetrating abdominal trauma, admitted to Groote Schuur Hospital trauma centre, Cape Town, South Africa, over 72 months (2014-2019). Demographic data (age, sex), preoperative assessments, operative interventions, and postoperative complications were recorded, with complications graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Out of 966 patients admitted during the study period with penetrating abdominal trauma, 36 (3.73%) had penetrating duodenal injuries. All 36 patients were male, with a mean age of 27.17 (SD 8.28) years. Thirty-three (91.67%) patients sustained gunshot wounds, and the remaining three (8.33%) had stab wounds. Fifteen (41.67%) patients underwent damage control surgery (DCS). Six (16.67%) patients developed a duodenal leak (DL). Ten (27.78%) patients died, including five DL patients, who died due to sepsis. CONCLUSION: Simple duodenal repair appears to be the best management option for penetrating duodenal injuries, except for severe injuries graded AAST IV-V where adjunct surgical techniques may be necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zoubi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: