Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background. Pancreatic injuries is a complex challenge for trauma surgeons, especially if combat, due to the presence of combined injuries and complications. The aim: to provide a structure, peculiarities of diagnosis and treatment of combat pancreatic trauma. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis was done of medical records of 58 inpatients who sustained combat pancreatic trauma during the war in Ukraine. Their average age was 37.4 ± 3.6 years (range 21–60 years). The mechanism of combat injury included gunshot wounds (87.9 %), explosive (10.3 %) and closed injuries (1.7 %). All the wounded underwent laboratory and instrumental investigations. Results. According to the nature of the combat injury, pancreatic injuries were categorised into gunshot shrapnel wounds — 50 (86.2 %), gunshot bullet wounds — 1 (1.7 %), explosive trauma — 6 (10.3 %), and closed combat trauma — 1 (1.7 %) case. Distribution by location of pancreatic injury: tail — 38 (65.5 %), head — 11 (19 %), body — 5 (8.6 %), body and tail — 2 (3.4 %), head and tail — 2 (3.4 %) cases. The following methods of surgical intervention were used: damage control surgery (DCS) — 51 (87.9 %) cases, one-stage surgery — 7 (12.1 %) cases. Distribution by the type of surgical intervention for pancreatic injury: drainage of the parapancreatic space — 45 (77.6 %), pancreatorrhaphy — 4 (6.9 %), distal pancreatosplenectomy — 3 (5.2 %), removal of foreign bodies (metal fragments) — 3 (5.2 %), distal resection of the pancreas with spleen preservation — 1 (1.7 %), pancreatoduodenectomy — 1 (1.7 %), subtotal resection of the body and tail of the pancreas with splenectomy — 1 (1.7 %) case. Common complications (n = 42): peritonitis — 9 (21.4 %), acute surgical sepsis — 8 (19 %), acute renal failure — 7 (16.7 %), multiple organ failure syndrome — 7 (16.7 %), pneumonia — 6 (14.3 %), bleeding — 4 (9.5 %), pulmonary embolism — 1 (2.4 %). Organ-specific complications (n = 28) were as follows: acute pancreatitis — 21 (75 %), pancreatic fistula — 4 (14.3 %), pseudocysts — 2 (7.1 %), abscess — 1 (3.6 %) case. Treatment outcomes: 33 patients (56.9 %) were transferred to the next stage of treatment, 19 (32.8 %) died, and 6 (10.3 %) were discharged with a definite outcome. Mortality rate: 5 (26.3 %) died in the first 3 days, 14 (73.7 %) cases died in the period from 4 to 15 days. Conclusions. The incidence of combat pancreatic trauma among abdominal wounds is 8.7 %. Surgical treatment for combat pancreatic trauma using the DCS is performed in 87.9 % of cases, and in the volume of a single-stage operation, in 12.1 %. The DCS leads to a reduction in the incidence of complications. The overall complication rate for combat pancreatic trauma is 72.4 %, and the incidence of organ-specific complications is 48.3 %. Mortality from pancreatic injuries is 32.8 %. Combat trauma to the head of the pancreas was mainly treated with closed drainage. Distal injuries were treated by resection or drainage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Хорошун et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: