PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 13, 2026Canadian Journal of Cardiology2 citationsOpen Access

Long-Term Outcomes of Stent Extension in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection

View Full Paper
QWQingsong WuKYKailong YeSLSiying Luo

Key Result

Stent extension during TEVAR for type B aortic dissection significantly reduced aortic-related mortality (3.8% vs 10.7%; P=0.032) and reoperation compared to non-stent extension.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=511)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does stent extension during TEVAR improve long-term outcomes in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection?

P
Population
511 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection undergoing TEVAR, followed for an average of 69.4 months.
E
Exposure
Stent extension (intentional distal placement of an additional covered stent to lengthen the repair zone within the descending aorta) during TEVAR.
C
Comparator
Non-stent extension during TEVAR (matched using 1:1 propensity score matching).
O
Outcome
Long-term outcomes including aortic-related mortality, negative aortic remodelling, follow-up entry flow, and reoperation.hard clinical

Stent extension during TEVAR for type B aortic dissection is associated with reduced aortic-related mortality, negative remodeling, and reoperation over long-term follow-up.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 3.8% vs 10.7%

p-value: p=0.032

Limitations

  • Retrospective design requiring prospective validation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The long-term efficacy of stent extension in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) has not been thoroughly evaluated. METHODS: This retrospective multicentre study included patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR between 2014 and 2021. On the basis of distal descending aorta coverage, patients were stratified into stent extension (SE) and nonstent extension (non-SE) groups. Stent extension was defined as the intentional distal placement of an additional covered stent to lengthen the repair zone within the descending aorta. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to balance baseline and perioperative characteristics, long-term outcomes were compared. Multivariate regression analysis identified risk factors. RESULTS: Among 511 enrolled patients with a median age of 56 (51-63) years, 241 patients received stent extension, and the average follow-up time was 69.4 months. After PSM (131 pairs), the groups were comparable. The SE group showed significantly lower rates of aortic-related mortality (3.8% vs 10.7%; P = 0.032), negative aortic remodelling (13.7% vs 23.7%; P = 0.039), follow-up entry flow (8.4% vs 18.3%; P = 0.018), and reoperation (3.8% vs 11.5%; P = 0.020). Stent extension was a protective factor against entry flow (odds ratio OR, 0.67; P = 0.014) and negative remodelling (OR, 0.73; P = 0.002). Risk factors included smaller true lumen diameter and patent false lumen for entry flow and patent false lumen with multiple distal tears for negative remodelling. Entry flow independently predicted aortic-related mortality (OR, 3.54; P < 0.001) and reoperation (OR, 5.63; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Stent extension during TEVAR for TBAD is associated with improved long-term outcomes, reducing complications and reinterventions. Prospective trials are warranted for validation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) (n=511). Stent extension vs. Non-stent extension was evaluated on aortic-related mortality (p=0.032). Stent extension during TEVAR for type B aortic dissection significantly reduced aortic-related mortality (3.8% vs 10.7%; P=0.032) and reoperation compared to non-stent extension.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa2eefa24af305511206be3https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2026.01.008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper