Key result
Hospital admission of suspected NSTE-ACS patients meeting rapid rule-out criteria resulted in only 0.32% experiencing MI or death at 30 days, with similar survival to discharged patients (P=0.88).
Why the study?
Many patients with suspected non-ST-elevation ACS are admitted despite initial hs-cTn values meeting rapid rule-out criteria for MI, but the outcomes, resource utilization, and diagnostic yield of this practice remain unclear.
Does hospital admission improve clinical outcomes compared to emergency department discharge in patients with suspected NSTE-ACS meeting rapid rule-out criteria?
Observational (n=11,477)
Does hospital admission improve clinical outcomes compared to emergency department discharge in patients with suspected NSTE-ACS meeting rapid rule-out criteria?
Hospital admission for suspected NSTE-ACS patients meeting rapid rule-out criteria consumes substantial resources without improving 30-day or long-term survival compared to ED discharge.
AIMS: Many patients with suspected non-ST-elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are admitted, even those with initial high-sensitivity cardiac troponins (hs-cTn) values who meet rapid rule-out criteria for myocardial infarction (MI). We examined the clinical outcomes, resource utilization, and diagnostic yield of suspected NSTE-ACS patients, who presented with hs-cTnT values meeting these criteria but were nevertheless hospitalized. METHODS AND RESULTS: Applying the 2020 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) rapid rule-out MI criteria, we identified consecutive patients with an initial value of hs-cTnT <5 ng/L or an initial value of ≥5 ng/L but <14 ng/L (99th percentile) and a small increment in a subsequent test, who were nevertheless admitted. The majority (85.4%) of patients presented to the emergency department (ED) with suspected NSTE-ACS had an initial hs-cTnT <99th percentile. We examined 3775 admitted patients out of 11 477 patients who were triaged and met MI rule-out criteria. Only 0.32% (12 patients) of admitted patients experienced index MI or overall death within 30 days. Resource utilization in terms of ED stay, hospital stay, noninvasive and invasive tests was substantial, yet revascularization was uncommon (2.5%). Multivariate adjustment for age, gender, and baseline cardiovascular risk factors demonstrates similar survival of admitted vs. discharged patients (P = 0.88). Initial hs-cTnT even below the 99th percentile provided a prognostic stratification for long term mortality. CONCLUSION: Our findings support a policy of ED discharge of suspected NSTE-ACS patients meeting rapid MI rule-out criteria and subsequent ambulatory evaluation, sparing resource-consuming admissions. In-hospital and ensuing prognosis were better with lower initial hs-cTnT values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cohen et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) (n=11,477). Hospital admission vs. Emergency department discharge was evaluated on Index MI or overall death within 30 days. Hospital admission of suspected NSTE-ACS patients meeting rapid rule-out criteria resulted in only 0.32% experiencing MI or death at 30 days, with similar survival to discharged patients (P=0.88).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: