Key result
Antiplatelet non-persistence after first PCI in ACS is linked to ~209% higher recurrent PCI risk.
Why the study?
ACS carries a high risk of recurrent events and treatment persistence reduces morbidity and mortality, but the association between antiplatelet persistence and clinical outcomes after first PCI required investigation.
Does persistence with antiplatelet therapy prevent major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in ACS patients after first PCI?
Cohort (n=367)
Yes
Does persistence with antiplatelet therapy prevent major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in ACS patients after first PCI?
Relative Risk: 3.09 (95% CI 1.18–8.05)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.68% vs 3.28%
Non-persistence with antiplatelet therapy after first PCI in ACS patients is associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrent PCI.
May support emphasizing antiplatelet persistence after first PCI in ACS; leaves open causal confirmation in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a life-threatening condition that carries high risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and death. Persistence with treatment is known to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with ACS. AIM: This study focuses on ACS patients undergoing their first percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to investigate the association between persistence with antiplatelet therapy and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study with 2 years of follow-up was conducted with 367 patients recruited. Patients were deemed as having persistence with antiplatelet therapy (WHO ATC code: B0A1C), if the gap between prescriptions was ≤30 days. The clinical outcomes were defined as a composite of major adverse cardiac event (MACE), major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), myocardial infarction, recurrent PCI, stroke, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization. RESULTS: Cumulative persistence with antiplatelet showed that 72.3% of all ACS patients were still taking antiplatelet 1 year after PCI. Persistence to treatment with antiplatelet therapy can be used as a predictor of MACE or MACCE, because it was associated with recurrent PCI (RR 3.09, 95% CI = 1.18−8.05). History of cardiovascular disease in non-persistence patients was associated with increased risk of MACE (RR 4.90 95% CI = 1.37−17.48) and MACCE (RR 3.67 95% CI = 1.12−11.98) events. CONCLUSION: After PCI, not all ACS patients continued taking their drug exactly as prescribed. Our study indicates that among ACS patients who underwent their first PCI, non-persistence with antiplatelet therapy might lead to worse clinical outcomes. This data will help promote secondary prevention among ACS patients after PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kristin et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (n=367). Non-persistence with antiplatelet therapy vs. Persistence with antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on Recurrent PCI (RR 3.09, 95% CI 1.18-8.05). Non-persistence with antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients after their first percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrent PCI (RR 3.09).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: