Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Technique: We present a method to determine the pressure at which significant cloud opacity is present between 2 and 6 bars on Jupiter. We use (a) the strength of a Fraunhofer absorption line in a zone to determine the ratio of reflected sunlight to thermal emission, and (b) pressure-broadened line profiles of deuterated methane (CH 3 D) at 4.66 μ m to determine the location of clouds. We use radiative transfer models to constrain the altitude region of both the solar and thermal components of Jupiter's 5 μ m spectrum. Results: For nearly all latitudes on Jupiter the thermal component is large enough to constrain the deep cloud structure even when upper clouds are present. We find that hot spots, belts, and high latitudes have broader line profiles than do zones. Radiative transfer models show that hot spots in the North Equatorial Belt and South Equatorial Belt (SEB) typically do not have opaque clouds at pressures greater than 2 bars. The South Tropical Zone (STZ) at 32 S has an opaque cloud top between 4 and 5 bars. From thermochemical models this must be a water cloud. We measured the variation of the equivalent width of CH 3 D with latitude for comparison with Jupiter's belt-zone structure. We also constrained the vertical profile of H 2 O in an SEB hot spot and in the STZ. The hot spot is very dry for P < 4.5 bars and then follows the H 2 O profile observed by the Galileo Probe. The STZ has a saturated H 2 O profile above its cloud top between 4 and 5 bars.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2015 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: