Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A versatile and robust method for the determination of DNA and PCR products (<500 bp) is presented, based on a mix of an Eu(III) chelate and acridine orange (AO). The nucleic acid selective stains acridine orange (AO) and ethidium bromide (EB) quench the luminescence of the bimetallic [Eu(2)(L(C2))(3)] and of other monometallic chelates such as the macrocyclic complex [Eu(L(kel))], even at very low molar ratios. Stern-Volmer plots of the metal-centered emission intensities (F(0)/F) and Eu((5)D(0)) lifetimes (tau(0)/tau) show the AO quenching being purely dynamic with K(D) = 6.7 x 10(5) M(-1) for [Eu(2)(L(C2))(3)] and 1.6 x 10(6) M(-1) for [Eu(L(kel))], and bimolecular rate constants k(q) = 2.7 x 10(8) M(-1) s(-1) and 3.4 x 10(9) M(-1) s(-1), respectively. On the other hand, EB quenching is due to both dynamic and static mechanisms. In the presence of various types of DNA > 0.1 ng microL(-1) (dsDNA, ssDNA or circular DNA), the quenched luminescence is reinstated, AO and EB intercalating into DNA, which removes the interaction with the Eu(III) complexes. The best results are obtained with [Eu(2)(L(C2))(3)]/AO with detections limits in the range 0.18-0.66 ng microL(-1); detection limits for the [Eu(L(kel))]/AO system are slightly larger; simpler monometallic Eu(III) complexes with dipicolinate derivatives do not follow suit in that they decompose in the presence of DNA. The Eu(III)/AO method is shown to be pH insensitive in the range 3-10; furthermore it is essentially insensitive to 1000-fold excesses of potential interfering substances, e.g. BSA, glucose, chelating agents and anions, alkaline earth and transition metal cations, variations in luminescence intensity being < 5%, (10 analytes) or 5-10% (4 analytes); only Co(II) and Cu(II) interfere substantially.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: