Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report the results of a deep (≈65 ks) Chandra exposure of the globular cluster NGC 6540, obtained by combining three observations carried out in 2023–2024 to investigate the nature of the peculiar X-ray source 3XMM J180608.9–274553. This source was previously observed with XMM–Newton to exhibit a short (≈300 s) and intense X-ray flare whose luminosity and duration are inconsistent with both typical type I X-ray bursts from low-mass X-ray binaries and stellar flares. Our new data indicate three faint X-ray sources near the position of the flare seen by XMM–Newton , only one of which was detected in a previous, much shorter Chandra observation. Based on the properties of these sources – localized at sub-arc-second precision – and of their optical counterparts, we discuss their possible nature and association with 3XMM J180608.9–274553: only one of these newly detected sources is compatible with the position of the flare. We also discuss a few scenarios – such as microlensing-induced amplification and black hole flaring activity analogous to that observed in Sgr A* – to explain the X-ray flare. Although these scenarios are intriguing, current observational evidence makes them both unlikely to be the origin of the XMM–Newton flare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sacchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: