Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this work, the generation of a new Y-zeolite-entrapped Ru(bpy) 2 (pypz) 2+ complex is reported, where bpy = 2,2‘-bipyridine and pypz = 2-(2-pyridyl)pyrazine. The integrity of the sample was documented by UV−visible, emission, resonance Raman (RR), and time-resolved resonance Raman (TR 3 ) spectroscopic data, as well as lifetime measurements. The Raman spectrum for the ground-state Z−Ru(bpy) 2 (pypz) 2+ intrazeolitic complex, with laser excitation at λ ex = 413.1 and 488.0 nm, closely matched that obtained for the free [Ru(byp) 2 (pypz)]Cl 2 complex, with some bands exhibiting slight frequency shifts of 2−5 cm - 1 . This finding indicates that the structure of the Ru 2+ complex does not change substantially upon entrapment in the Y-zeolite supercages. On the other hand, the emission spectroscopic investigation revealed a 16 nm blue shift of the Z−Ru(bpy) 2 (pypz) 2+ phosphorescence, relative to that of the free [Ru(bpy) 2 (pypz)]Cl 2 complex, and the lifetime measurements revealed a 210 ns increase of the triplet excited-state ( 3 MLCT) lifetime. These data suggest perturbation of the Ru(byp) 2 (pypz) 2+ complex electronic structure, presumably induced by interaction of the peripheral N heteroatom with the zeolite framework. Temperature-dependent lifetime measurements indicated that decay via the thermally populated, so-called, “fourth MLCT state” (4th-MLCT) was dominant both for the Ru(bpy) 2 (pypz) 2+ complex in solution and for the complex entrapped within the zeolite supercages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Szulbinski et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: