Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Due to over-harvesting and habitat degradation, spawning stock abundance and biomass of the Chesapeake Bay blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) has declined over 80% in the last 15 years. In addition, only a small portion (11–22%) of the spawning stock migrates successfully to the historic spawning areas of the lower estuary. As a result, recent management goals to decrease harvests and increase spawning stock biomass have been adopted by the different Chesapeake Bay regulatory agencies. The crisis has also prompted an experimental assessment of the potential for stock enhancement to increase the number of spawners. While much of the current stock enhancement work has focused on assessing the competency of hatchery-reared individuals and identifying key processes that optimize survival and growth of juveniles to maturity, less attention has been paid to examining factors that influence the long-term efficacy of stock enhancement efforts. Here we discuss important interactions between blue crab life history, stock enhancement efforts, and management options available to increase the standing stock of mature females in Chesapeake Bay. We propose the establishment of migration corridors to protect female blue crabs when they undergo the long-distance migration after mating to lower Bay spawning areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aguilar et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: