This article compares the differences in the use of textual features and cohesive devices among translators with different levels of translation competence. The data are extracted from a Chinese into English translation corpus, which consists of 315 translation passages produced by 105 translators. The features and devices identified in the literature review are first subjected to a one-way ANOVA and then a discriminant analysis to yield those features and devices statistically salient enough to differentiate translation competence levels. The results of this study provide insight into L2 translation competence and suggest a new approach to assessing such competence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: