Key result
Rat muscarinic receptor affinity differs between atrial and intestinal tissues but not between atria.
This preclinical study demonstrates pharmacological differences between atrial and intestinal muscarinic receptors, but not between right and left atrial receptors in rats.
Rat data suggest atrial-intestinal muscarinic differences without right-left atrial distinction; leaves open human subtype selectivity for cardiac versus GI effects.
Although extensively investigated, the extent of differences between receptors mediating negative inotropic and chronotropic responses is still unclear. In the present study atrial and intestinal muscarinic receptors were identified by [3H]-N-methyl-scopolamine ([3H]-NMS) binding and the affinities of some presumably inotropy- or chronotropy-selective agonists and several antagonists determined. 2. All the agonists tested showed similar affinity for right and left atrial receptors. Accepting an affinity difference of 0.4 log units as experimental error, none of the agonists tested was selective for either atrium. 3. Affinity differences of the cardioselective antagonists himbacine, AF-DX 116 and methoctramine and the M1-selective antagonist dicyclomine for right and left atrial muscarinic receptors were also minimal (less than 2 fold selective). When compared to intestinal receptors, AF-DX 116 was 3 to 4 fold, methoctramine 10 to 13 fold selective and himbacine and dicyclomine non-selective. 4. These data provide evidence for differences between atrial and intestinal but not between right and left atrial muscarinic receptors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Friedrich Brünner (1989) studied this question. Muscarinic agonists and antagonists vs. Intestinal receptors was evaluated on Receptor affinity. Direct binding studies in rats demonstrated differences in muscarinic receptor affinity between atrial and intestinal tissues, but no significant differences between right and left atrial receptors.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: