Key result
Intensive glycemic treatment linked to fewer CV events and deaths in cardiac autonomic neuropathy.
Why the study?
It remained unclear whether the increased cardiovascular and mortality risk associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy is mitigated by intensive glycemic treatment.
Does intensive glycemic treatment reduce cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiac autonomic neuropathy?
Observational (n=7,866)
Does intensive glycemic treatment reduce cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiac autonomic neuropathy?
Intensive glycemic treatment mitigates the increased cardiovascular and mortality risk associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support intensive glycemic control in T2D with CAN; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is one of the proposed risk factors for cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN). CAN is associated with increased cardiovascular and mortality risk. But it remains unclear whether cardiovascular and mortality risk associated with CAN is mitigated by intensive glycemic treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: This secondary analysis included 7866 patients from the ACCORDION (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Follow-On) study. CAN was defined using ECG-derived measures. End points included primary outcome (composite of cardiovascular events) and total deaths. During a median follow-up of 8.9 years, a total of 1341 cardiovascular events and 1364 all-cause deaths were ascertained. Compared with standard treatment, intensive treatment reduced risk of primary outcome and total deaths among patients with CAN but not among those without CAN. Compared with absence of CAN, the presence of CAN was associated with increased risk of primary outcome and total deaths in the standard group but not in the intensive group. Significant interactions were found between CAN status and treatment arms on risk of primary outcome and total deaths. Incidence rates per 100 person-years of primary outcome and total deaths were similar between patients without CAN and those with CAN undergoing intensive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive glycemic treatment mitigates cardiovascular and mortality risk associated with CAN and may serve as an effective way in the management of CAN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Type 2 Diabetes (n=7,866). Intensive glycemic treatment vs. Standard treatment was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular events. Over a median 8.9 years, intensive glycemic treatment reduced the risk of cardiovascular events and total deaths among patients with cardiac autonomic neuropathy compared with standard treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: