This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The present research paper is based on a comparative study of stationary tool micro-ultrasonic machining (STMUSM) and rotary tool micro-ultrasonic machining (RTMUSM). Microchannels were developed on glass work material by using both processes. The effect of tool rotation on the performance of micro-USM was investigated. The performance of both processes was compared on the basis of material removal rate (MRR) and depth of channel (DOC) as response characteristics. The power rating, work feed rate, concentration of abrasive slurry, and abrasive mesh size were chosen as variable input process parameters in this investigation. The form accuracy of the fabricated microchannels was analyzed with the help of imaging technique. Also, a qualitative analysis of tool wear was carried out with the help of microscopic images. The experimental results revealed that the tool rotation significantly improved the performance of micro-USM. The RTMUSM resulted in 155% and 147% higher MRR and DOC as compared to STMUSM. The tool wear was also found to be lesser in RTMUSM as compared to STMUSM and as a result of that form accuracy of machined microchannels improved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: