This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Crown-ether cyanide treatment, which simply involves immersion in KCN solutions containing 18-crown-6 followed by rinse, is studied in relation to electrical and optical properties of nitrogen-doped, polycrystalline Cu2O thin films, and its effect is compared with that of hydrogen treatment. By the crown-ether cyanide treatment, the luminescence intensity due to the near-band-edge emission of Cu2O at around 680 nm is enhanced, and the hole density is increased from the order of 1016 to 1017 cm−3, analogous to hydrogen treatment. The effects of the passivation by the hydrogen treatment completely disappear after annealing at 350 °C, while those of the crown-ether cyanide treatment stay unchanged after the same annealing treatment. From these results, the crown-ether cyanide treatment for polycrystalline Cu2O thin films can be concluded to be a more suitable method of passivating defects than the hydrogen treatment.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okamoto et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: