Key result
Preconditioning with three cycles of hypoventilation significantly increased the ventricular arrhythmia threshold to 4.25 mA during subsequent prolonged hypoventilation compared to baseline.
Why the study?
Does preconditioning by hypoventilation increase ventricular arrhythmia threshold in Wistar rats?
Does preconditioning by hypoventilation increase ventricular arrhythmia threshold in Wistar rats?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.25% vs 1.27%
p-value: p=<0.001
Three cycles of hypoventilation preconditioning effectively protect against hypoventilation/reoxygenation-induced decreases in ventricular arrhythmia threshold in a rat model.
Supports investigation of hypoventilation preconditioning in rat arrhythmia models; leaves open clinical translation.
Hypoventilation, as one of ventilatory disorders, decreases the electrical stability of the heart similarly as ischemia. If preconditioning by short cycles of ischemia has a cardioprotective effect against harmful influences of a prolonged ischemic period, then preconditioning by hypoventilation (HPC) can also have a similar effect. Anesthetized rats (ketamine 100 mg/kg + xylasine 15 mg/kg i.m., open chest experiments) were subjected to 20 min of hypoventilation followed by 20 min of reoxygenation (control group). The preconditioning (PC) was induced by one (1PC), two (2PC) or three (3PC) cycles of 5-min hypoventilation followed by 5-min reoxygenation. The electrical stability of the heart was measured by a ventricular arrhythmia threshold (VAT) tested by electrical stimulation of the right ventricle. Twenty-minute hypoventilation significantly decreased the VAT in the control and 1PC groups (p<0.05) and non-significantly in 2PC vs. the initial values. Reoxygenation reversed the VAT values to the initial level only in the control group. In 3PC, the VAT was increased from 2.32±0.69 mA to 4.251.31 mA. during hypoventilation (p<0.001) and to 4.37±1.99 mA during reoxygenation (p<0.001). It is concluded that cardioprotection against the hypoventilation/ reoxygenation-induced decrease of VAT proved to be effective only after three cycles of HPC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Švorc et al. (2003) studied Ventricular arrhythmia vulnerability during hypoventilation (n=38). Preconditioning by hypoventilation (3 cycles) vs. No preconditioning (control group) was evaluated on Ventricular arrhythmia threshold (VAT) during 20 min of hypoventilation (p=<0.001). Preconditioning with three cycles of hypoventilation significantly increased the ventricular arrhythmia threshold to 4.25 mA during subsequent prolonged hypoventilation compared to baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: