In this paper, we provide alternative proofs of fundamental results of Walrasian general equilibrium theory, and of cooperative game theory, by viewing them as results pertaining to a two-person qualitative or a one-person generalized game: in short, by giving them a game-theoretic underpinning. Under the first category, we have the Gale–Nikaido–Kuhn–Debreu (GNKD) lemma in mind, and under the second, the Knaster–Kuratowski–Mazurkiewicz–Shapley (KKMS) lemma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: