A sequential activation of L-selectin and beta 2-integrins on neutrophils is crucial for the rolling, adherence and subsequent migration of these cells on the endothelium. However, little is known about a possible interplay between these adhesion receptors in the final regulation of cell motility. The results presented here show that sulfatides themselves (here used as tools to activate L-selectins), have no major effect on the cellular content of filamentous actin (F-actin), but cause a time-related decrease in the beta 2-integrin-induced formation of F-actin. This effect of sulfatides was abolished in cells lacking L-selectin as a result of pretreatment with chymotrypsin. A similar sulfatide-induced activation of L-selectin also caused a pronounced and time-related decrease of a subsequent chemotactic peptide-induced F-actin response. The effect of sulfatides on both beta 2-integrin- and chemotactic peptide-induced F-actin were abolished if L-selectin were blocked by preincubating the cells with specific antibodies to L-selectin. These effects of L-selectin engagement on cellular F-actin content were neither abolished by blocking the cytosolic free Ca2+ signal with bis-(2-amino-5-methylphenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraaceticacid tetraacetoxymethyly ester (MAPT/AM) nor by blocking a cAMP-induced activation of protein kinase A by pretreating the cells with adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophos-phorothioate (Rp-cAMPS). Instead we found that L-selectin engagement impaired an early beta 2-integrin-induced tyrosine kinase activation, an event shown to be necessary for a normal beta 2-integrin-mediated F-actin response. The present demonstration of a negative feed-back function of L-selectin on beta 2-integrin-induced modulations of the actin cytoskeleton, suggests that the relative distribution and/or density of the respective L-selectin and beta 2-integrin ligands on endothelial cells might be important factors in determining the final site of firm adhesion and extravasation of neutrophils.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng-Sikorski et al. (1996) studied this question.