Key result
Rivaroxaban fails to reduce symptomatic VTE and related death vs placebo in acutely ill older patients.
Why the study?
Although older patients face an increased risk for VTE, thromboprophylaxis is underused due to bleeding concerns, leading researchers to evaluate rivaroxaban benefit/risk in patients ≥75 years of age.
Does rivaroxaban reduce symptomatic postdischarge VTE and VTE-related death in acutely ill medical patients ≥75 years of age?
RCT
double-blind
randomized
Does rivaroxaban reduce symptomatic postdischarge VTE and VTE-related death in acutely ill medical patients ≥75 years of age?
Hazard Ratio: 0.73 (95% CI 0.43–1.22)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.2% vs 1.6%
Rivaroxaban for extended thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients ≥75 years of age shows a consistent benefit/risk profile compared to the general population, with no significant increase in major bleeding.
Supports extended rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis in patients ≥75 years; confirms consistent effect across age groups.
BACKGROUND: Although older patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), thromboprophylaxis is underused because of bleeding concerns. The MARINER trial evaluated whether rivaroxaban reduced symptomatic postdischarge VTE in acutely ill medical patients. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that rivaroxaban would have a favorable benefit/risk profile in patients ≥75 years of age. METHODS: Patients were randomized in a double-blind manner at hospital discharge to rivaroxaban (10 mg/day for creatinine clearance ≥50 ml/min; 7.5 mg/day for ≥30-<50 ml/min) or placebo for 45 days. Using a Cox proportional hazard model including treatment as a covariate, we compared the risk of the primary efficacy outcome (symptomatic VTE plus VTE-related death in the intention-to-treat population) and safety outcome (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major bleeding in the safety population) in the prespecified subgroups of patients ≥ and <75 years of age. RESULTS: The primary event rate in patients ≥75 years of age was 2-fold higher than that in those <75 years. The incidence of the primary efficacy outcomes in both age groups was numerically lower with rivaroxaban than with placebo (≥75: 1.2% and 1.6%, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.43-1.22; <75 0.6% and 0.8%, HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.46-1.32; interaction p-value for age group = .85). The incidence of major bleeding was low and similar in the two age and treatment groups (interaction p value for age group = .35). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic VTE and VTE-related death occur frequently in older patients with acute medical illness. The benefit/risk profile of rivaroxaban in patients ≥75 years of age appears consistent with that observed in the general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ageno et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in acutely ill medical patients. Rivaroxaban vs. placebo was evaluated on symptomatic VTE plus VTE-related death (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.43-1.22). In acutely ill medical patients ≥75 years of age, rivaroxaban resulted in a numerically lower rate of symptomatic VTE and VTE-related death compared to placebo (1.2% vs 1.6%; HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.43-1.22).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: