Key result
Fencing as a control mechanism for foot-and-mouth disease transmission in sub-Saharan Africa has both positive and negative attributes that require a regional approach to disease control.
Why the study?
Does fencing control the transmission of foot-and-mouth disease between wildlife and domestic livestock in sub-Saharan Africa?
Population
Livestock and wildlife in sub-Saharan Africa
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet alter FMD fencing practices; leaves open optimal regional strategies for prospective evaluation.
Does fencing control the transmission of foot-and-mouth disease between wildlife and domestic livestock in sub-Saharan Africa?
Fencing has both positive and negative attributes as a control mechanism for foot-and-mouth disease transmission between wildlife and livestock in sub-Saharan Africa.
P. Sutmöller (2002) conducted a review in Foot-and-mouth disease. Fencing was evaluated. Fencing as a control mechanism for foot-and-mouth disease transmission in sub-Saharan Africa has both positive and negative attributes that require a regional approach to disease control.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: