Key result
Transcranial Doppler requires at least a 1-hour recording to reliably detect highly variable embolic signals.
Why the study?
What is the variability and required recording time for detecting embolic signals using TCD in patients with embolic sources?
Observational (n=7)
Blinded analysis
What is the variability and required recording time for detecting embolic signals using TCD in patients with embolic sources?
TCD recordings for detecting cerebral microemboli require at least 1 hour of monitoring due to high temporal variability, and follow-up assessments should be standardized to the same time of day.
Recordings shorter than 1 hour may miss cerebral microemboli owing to high variability; leaves open the minimum duration for reliable TCD detection in larger cohorts.
Albeit still unproven, it is supposed that the presence and number of asymptomatic circulating cerebral microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) may be an indicator of stroke risk. Little research has been done to assess the reproducibility of these data and the required time for recording. We examined one middle cerebral artery in 7 subjects with carotid, aortic or cardiac embolic source for 24 h by TCD. Analysis for embolic signals was done off line completely blinded to the diagnosis and the time of the day during the recording. Embolic signals were found in all 7 subjects varying from 0 per h to 13 per h. Embolic signals occurred throughout the day with a nonsignificant tendency towards higher values in the early morning hours. Half an hour recording would not have been suitable to rule out or to confirm the presence of embolic signals as there were too many gaps between embolic signals of more than 1/2 h. One hour is the required minimum. Concerning the number of embolic signals, even a recording of four hours yielded variabilities of 0.25 and 8 embolic signals per hour in the same person. We recommend to perform follow-up studies the same time of the day. In patients with a low number of embolic signals longer recordings or a lower detection threshold with a higher number of detected embolic signals are necessary to compare frequencies of embolic signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Droste et al. (1996) conducted an observational in Carotid, aortic or cardiac embolic source (n=7). 24-hour transcranial Doppler (TCD) recording was evaluated on Occurrence and variability of embolic signals. Embolic signals were detected in all 7 subjects (varying from 0 to 13 per hour), demonstrating high variability that requires at least a one-hour recording to reliably confirm their presence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: