Key result
Early PPM post-TAVI is linked to ~1 extra hospital day versus no pacemaker.
Why the study?
The optimum timing of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI is unclear, balancing conservative observation for conduction recovery against pacing overutilization.
Is early permanent pacemaker implantation safe and associated with appropriate pacing utilization in patients undergoing TAVI?
Observational (n=1,398)
Is early permanent pacemaker implantation safe and associated with appropriate pacing utilization in patients undergoing TAVI?
Early permanent pacemaker implantation post-TAVI is safe and associated with high pacing utilization, supporting its use without a prolonged observation period.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early PPM post-TAVI extends median stay by 1 day; supports high utilization yet leaves optimal timing hypothesis-generating.
BACKGROUND: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a common complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The optimum timing of PPM implantation is still unclear as conduction abnormalities evolve and a balance needs to be struck between conservative delays in the hope of conduction recovery and overutilization of pacing. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of early PPM implantation, without an observation period, among TAVI patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study of 1398 TAVI patients. Clinical and pacing data were collected at baseline, 30 days and at a median of 15 (4-21) months post-TAVI. Study endpoints included PPM-related complications, pacing utilization and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: One hundred five patients (8.2%) required a PPM, of which 13 were implanted pre and 92 post-TAVI. Seventy-six percent required pacing for either second- or third-degree heart block. Time to implantation for post-TAVI PPM was 1 (0-3) day. Six patients experienced a pacing-related complication- lead displacement (n = 3), hematoma (n = 2), and device infection (n = 1). Pacing utilization defined as pacing >10% of the time or a pacing requirement at the time of the pacing check was demonstrated in 83% of patients. Multivariate analysis revealed complete heart block (CHB) was the only independent predictor of pacing utilization. Hospital length of stay for the post-TAVI PPM group was longer than the group without PPM (4 [2-8] vs. 3 [2-4] days; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Early PPM implantation in TAVI patients is safe and majority of patients require pacing in the short and mid-term.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (n=1,398). Early permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation vs. No permanent pacemaker was evaluated on Hospital length of stay (days) (p=< .001). Early permanent pacemaker implantation post-TAVI was associated with a longer hospital length of stay compared to no pacemaker (median 4 vs. 3 days; p < 0.001), with 83% pacing utilization.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: