This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Geometric quantum gates, leveraging the geometric properties of evolution paths, offer inherent robustness against certain types of operational errors. In this work, we extend the concept of adiabatic geometric quantum gates to non‐Hermitian two‐level systems. Starting from the biorthogonal formalism, we derive the general expression for the complex Berry phase in non‐Hermitian quantum systems. By constructing a non‐Hermitian Hamiltonian driven by complex pulses and employing a single‐loop multiple‐pulse strategy, we demonstrate that the adiabatic cyclic evolution accumulates a purely geometric Abelian phase, enabling the realization of a universal set of single‐qubit geometric gates. We further analyze the impact of systematic errors on geometric gates, demonstrating their robustness against small pulse parameter variations. Finally, we propose a feasible scheme to implement a controlled‐phase () gate in a non‐Hermitian system of two Rydberg‐interacting atoms. Our results establish non‐Hermitian adiabatic geometric quantum gates as a viable and error‐resilient approach for quantum information processing. This work provides comprehensive theoretical support for non‐Hermitian geometric quantum computation and lays the foundation for the design and experimental realization of high‐fidelity, noise‐resilient quantum gates in open quantum systems.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: