PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate oxygen/energy cost (OC/EC) of running and substrate utilization before and after strenuous cycling in well-trained junior triathletes and the relevance of changes in these variables for fatigued running performance. METHODS: Nineteen junior squad triathletes (4 female, 15 male; 17.2 [1.8] y; maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2peak) 61.4 [5.1] mL·kg-1·min-1) completed 3 submaximal running steps (2.8 m·s-1, +0.4 m·s-1, and 5 min) under fresh conditions, followed by an incremental cycling test (∼2 W·kg-1, +20 W, and 3 min) to exhaustion. Afterward, they performed another incremental running test to exhaustion under fatigued conditions for V˙O2peak, OC, and time-to-exhaustion assessment. During both runs, OC, EC, and carbohydrate/fat oxidation (CHO/FO) were assessed. RESULTS: Contrary to trivial/small average changes in OC (210 [15] to 209 [14] mL·kg-1·km-1, P = .71) and EC (4.75 [0.33] to 4.59 [0.29] kJ·kg-1·km-1, P = .02), CHO decreased (2.96 [0.68] to 2.08 [0.68] g·min-1) while FO increased (0.15 [0.13] to 0.48 [0.22] g·min-1) significantly from fresh to fatigued running (P < .001). Besides V˙O2peak (r = .68, P = .002), the changes in CHO (r = -.60, P = .01) and FO (r = .67, P = .003) were significantly correlated with fatigued time to exhaustion (1715 [172] s). Multiple regression and commonality analysis identified V˙O2peak, OC, and the change in FO as the best model for time to exhaustion (R2 = 88%). CONCLUSION: Despite trivial/small changes in OC/EC from fresh to fatigued running, a pronounced shift in substrate utilization from CHO to FO was evident in junior triathletes, which was also associated with fatigued running performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Röhrs et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: