Key result
Higher mitral annulus calcification scores were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of having a pacemaker implanted for an atrioventricular conduction disturbance (OR 1.11).
Why the study?
Due to its proximity to the bundle of His, mitral annulus calcification (MAC) might be linked to AV conduction disturbances, but this association required evaluation.
Is mitral annulus calcification associated with atrioventricular conduction disturbances?
Cross-Sectional (n=14,771)
Yes
Is mitral annulus calcification associated with atrioventricular conduction disturbances?
Odds Ratio: 1.11 (95% CI 1.01–1.23)
p-value: p=0.04
Mitral annulus calcification is significantly associated with atrioventricular conduction disturbances, including pacemaker implantation for AV block and prolonged QRS duration.
MAC may flag higher AV block risk but should not yet change practice; leaves open causal link needing prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Due to its location very close to the bundle of His, mitral annulus calcification (MAC) might be associated with the development of atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances. This study assessed the association between MAC and AV conduction disturbances identified by cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) use and electrocardiographic parameters. The association between MAC and traditional cardiovascular risk factors was also assessed. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed 14,771 participants, predominantly men aged 60-75 years, from the population-based Danish Cardiovascular Screening trial. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors were obtained. Using cardiac non-contrast computed tomography imaging, MAC scores were measured using the Agatston method and divided into absent versus present and score categories. CIED implantation data were obtained from the Danish Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Register. A 12-lead electrocardiogram was available for 2,107 participants. Associations between MAC scores and AV conduction disturbances were assessed using multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: MAC was present in 22.4% of the study subjects. Participants with pacemakers for an AV conduction disturbance had significantly higher MAC scores (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.23) than participants without a CIED, whereas participants with a CIED for other reasons did not. Prolonged QRS-interval was significantly associated with the presence of MAC (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.04-2.04), whereas prolonged PQ-interval was not. Female sex and most traditional cardiovascular risk factors were significantly associated with high MAC scores. CONCLUSIONS: MAC was associated with AV conduction disturbances, which could improve our understanding of the development of AV conduction disturbances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rasmussen et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrioventricular conduction disturbances (n=14,771). Mitral annulus calcification (MAC) vs. Absence of MAC or lower MAC score was evaluated on Pacemaker implantation due to an atrioventricular conduction disturbance (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.23, p=0.04). Higher mitral annulus calcification scores were significantly associated with an increased likelihood of having a pacemaker implanted for an atrioventricular conduction disturbance (OR 1.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: