Key result
Auscultatory BP measurement errors risk pseudohypertension and overtreatment, highlighting the value of ambulatory monitoring.
Highlights the risk of pseudohypertension from inaccurate indirect blood pressure measurements and emphasizes the potential value of ambulatory monitoring.
Auscultatory BP errors may cause overtreatment; leaves open ambulatory monitoring value pending prospective validation.
Arterial hypertension is a risk factor both for morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis usually depends on the auscultation method using the cuff and the mercury manometer, which remains the international reference method. However, this indirect method is the source of numerous errors, sometimes important, which are related variously to the equipment used, the observer, the conditions under which the measurement is taken and sometimes to the patient. Such errors can in turn lead to therapeutic overdosage and to unnecessary treatment, which may be dangerous. "Pseudohypertension" is a typical example of the problems. Various means have been proposed to improve the reliability of measurements, above all the physician must adhere strictly to the correct routine. The use of self-registering equipment, provided it is scientifically assayed, can be considered for incidental measurements or for ambulant use. The ambulant measurement of arterial pressure promises to be of diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic value, but further experience is required to confirm these impressions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viet et al. (1992) conducted a review in Arterial hypertension. Auscultation method for blood pressure measurement was evaluated. Indirect measurement of arterial pressure via auscultation is prone to errors leading to pseudohypertension and unnecessary treatment, highlighting the potential value of ambulant measurement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: