Key result
Isolated TVR linked to ~51% lower long-term all-cause mortality versus concomitant TVR.
Why the study?
Tricuspid valve replacement, especially as an isolated procedure, is historically associated with high perioperative risk and poor outcomes.
Does isolated TVR improve in-hospital and long-term survival compared to concomitant TVR in adult patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Cohort (n=245)
No
Does isolated TVR improve in-hospital and long-term survival compared to concomitant TVR in adult patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Isolated tricuspid valve replacement is associated with significantly lower in-hospital and long-term mortality compared to concomitant TVR, suggesting that early intervention before multivalve disease progression may optimize outcomes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for isolated tricuspid replacement; prospective randomized trials needed before any practice change.
Background: Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR), particularly as an isolated procedure, is historically associated with high perioperative risk and poor outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate in-hospital and long-term outcomes of isolated versus concomitant TVR and identify predictors of morbidity/mortality in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Methods: This retrospective study included 245 consecutive adult patients who underwent surgical TVR at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between 1993 and 2019. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and long-term survival. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with in-hospital mortality, adjusting for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and TRI-SCORE. Additionally, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with long-term mortality, adjusting for age, CKD, TRI-SCORE, and previous cardiac surgery history. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were utilized to adjust for baseline differences. Results: Patients were categorized into two groups: isolated TVR (n = 128) and concomitant TVR (n = 117). The mean age was 47 ± 13 years, 58.4% were male, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 62 ± 10%. Isolated TVR patients had lower in-hospital mortality (7.8% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.017) compared to concomitant TVR patients. At 1, 5, and 10 years, the survival rates for isolated TVR were 89.1%, 83.3%, and 77.7%, respectively. For concomitant TVR, the corresponding rates were 72.6%, 68.9%, and 60.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified isolated TVR as protective against in-hospital death (odds ratio (OR) = 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.17–0.95; p = 0.037) and overall mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.30–0.81; p = 0.005). Additionally, TRI-SCORE and CKD were associated with in-hospital mortality, and both remained significant predictors of long-term mortality. IPTW and PSM analyses confirmed the results. Conclusions: Isolated TVR is associated with lower in-hospital and long-term mortality compared to concomitant TVR. Early referral before multivalve disease progression and meticulous patient selection—particularly avoiding advanced right-sided heart failure or renal dysfunction—may optimize outcomes. These findings advocate for timely isolated TVR in select TR patients to mitigate the compounding risks of delayed intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Severe tricuspid regurgitation (n=245). Isolated tricuspid valve replacement vs. Concomitant tricuspid valve replacement was evaluated on Long-term all-cause mortality (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.81, p=0.005). Isolated tricuspid valve replacement was associated with a 51% lower risk of long-term all-cause mortality compared to concomitant replacement (HR 0.49).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: