This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The objective of the present study was to analyze the relapse rate and the magnitude of relapse after mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) using cephalometric measurements. The sample comprised 63 patients (49 women, 14 men) with moderate to severe mandibular retrognathia, mean age of 22.6 years, who underwent MDO between 2010 and 2021. Data were collected from CBCTs recorded preoperatively (T0), after the active distraction phase (T1), and 12 months after the distraction phase (T2). Two-dimensional cephalometry analyses were performed. The mean cephalometric advancement was at T1 for mandibular body length (MBL) 10.30 mm, for mandibular unit length (MUL) 8.00 mm, and for SN-Pog 4.84°. At T2, MUL decreased by 0.26 mm (p = 0.14), and MBL by 0.22 mm (p = 0.39). A positive correlation between the magnitude of distraction and the magnitude of relapse was identified (MBL p = 0.045; MUL p = 0.002). MDO is a reliable method of advancing the mandible in retrognathic adult patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Köstenberger et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: